North Carolina For John McCain
This group is for residents of North Carolina. This group is for discussing how to help Senator McCain in our state.
The propagation of Junior Senator Barack Obama as a candidate for the highest office of a first world nation is a defining manifestation of methodical, multi-partisan, collaborative efforts to dumb-down Americans, a longstanding assault on free-thinking individualists both within the borders of the United States and throughout the world.
There is no need for a Manchurian Candidate; the constituency has been brainwashed through the demoralizing, reductionist, speculative tyranny of the psychopharmacology corporate and its dispassionate socialist collaborators, as well as the aesthetic, cultural, and linguistic terrorism spewed forth from the corporate socialists of Hollywood and other self-identified bastions of "culture" in collaboration with the, again, corporate socialist mainstream media.
Those who bemoan the image of America should look to the very people who have irresponsibly and deliberately created an aesthetic and qualitative vacuum in American society, a void observed and disdained by those around the world unfortunate enough to be subjected to its nihilistic surreality via "technology." These same psychological and spiritual terrorists have collaborated in the creation and coercive propagation of a virtual statesman, a disintegrated opportunist, a projected, teleprompted veneer of the Corporate, to fill the qualitative void they themselves effected. A suitable candidate for the global Manchurian constituency.
It is no wonder that John McCain has called us to fight for the ideas and character of a free people. A people made up of individuals.
Voting "present" and making decisions based upon polls, committee consultation, and the agenda of interests far removed from the majority of the American people is neither meritorious nor expedient.
John McCain, who is running for President, rather than Vice-President, of the United States of America, of which there are fifty rather than fifty-seven, has a proven capacity for self-reliance and strategic planning. John McCain's proven qualities of leadership and statesmanship far outshine those of his opponent in the realms of both inspiration and manifestation.
Junior Senator Obama must rely upon committees, polling data, and sycophants in order to make crucial decisions, and rely upon sympathetic cooperation from the media to "explain" his intentions and actions--or lack thereof--to the public. Of course, there are numerous instances in which McCain makes a decision first which Obama and his team can copy upon observing statistics denoting favorable reaction from the voting public. During unexpected crises, the President of the United States cannot, ostensibly, vote “present” or lay low in Hawaii while waiting to assess the lay of the land as it relates to his or her own fortunes, or understand the perspectives of foreign leaders and cultures---not to mention those of the diverse American population----through quantitative statistics quoted on Real Clear Politics.
Although the Clinton administration cultivated this practice, it hardly leads to just and meritorious decision-making, especially in the realms of foreign policy.
Obama could avoid this expensive, inexpedient, bureaucratic method of decision making. He could, as was noted during the Republican Convention, simply "Call McCain."
I am an independent voter who has been a enthusiastic supporter of John McCain. I believe that Senator McCain is a principled statesman whose political involvement reflects an astute awareness of politics and government as manifestations of society and culture in broad historical context.
I believe that John McCain has a rare ability to not only focus upon seemingly isolated decisions and issues, but to pull back and consider such things in broader context, in terms of cause and effect. I also admire the fact that he is comfortable in trusting his intuition and his inner capacity for compassion; this combination enables an access to the collective consciousness beyond ones own personal experiences.
His inclusion of Governor Palin for this prominent position in his administration, especially in potential combination with certain members of his present circle, further attests to his wisdom and generosity of spirit. The generosity lies in that he has already intuitively bequeathed several timely catalysts for significant, beneficial political and social change through the inner revolution of individual perception, rather than artificial structure, during the process of his campaign for President, rather than undermining such opportunities through the caution and self-censorship that ambition often effects.
No matter the outcome of this election, Governor Palin's candidacy is a very good thing for American society. Your article addresses only one of many crucial reasons why this is so.
The cold truth is that proponents of eugenics don't believe that an infant like Baby Palin is "supposed" to be here. Some would even claim that Palin is selfish for insisting upon allowing her infant to survive.
For some, there is no reason for a "progressive" society to permit such a reminder of natural diversity and what THEY perceive as "imperfection" to impose itself upon society. Some such people cite financial reasons, national or ethnic strength, etc., but what most of them really hate is having a mirror among them that says, quietly yet clearly---that could be me.
Some believe that they cannot afford to experience the introspection, and even pain, that compassion entails; they believe it will make them weak, make society weak.
For such people, Baby Palin is a reminder of frailty, of chance, of mortality. They fear him, they fear they cannot "go there" without disintegrating, without losing themselves. Baby Palin must be reduced, categorized, as an "other."
And here our troubles began, as one author on racism and genocide has said.
Nobody would castigate a Martin Luther King for entrusting Mrs. King with the care of their infant in order for King to advocate a cause on behalf of that infant, to dedicate his gifts to the struggle for human dignity, to the validation of their infant.
I strongly believe that Baby Palin supports the efforts of his mother and family in ensuring that he exists: not only as a living creature, like all of us, in this realm, but that he exists in our collective mind and spirit. A family, a people, a nation, is judged according to how it recognizes the least powerful among its own.
---Laura Semilian
Obama's adviser Zbig Brzezinski.
The quotes below provide repulsive reading for traditional conservatives, believers of many different faiths, and free-thinkers in general. Anti-war activists and traditional progressives are among those who have been hoodwinked by Obama, Inc.
The technotronic era involves the gradual appearance of a more controlled society. Such a society would be dominated by an elite, unrestrained by traditional values (like liberty and democracy). Soon it will be possible to assert almost continuous surveillance over every citizen and maintain up-to-date complete files containing even the most personal information about the citizen. These files will be subject to instantaneous retrieval by the authorities.
- Between Two Ages: America's Role in the Technetronic Era, 1970
"In the technotronic society the trend would seem to be towards the aggregation of the individual support of millions of uncoordinated citizens, easily within the reach of magnetic and attractive personalities exploiting the latest communications techniques to manipulate emotions and control reason."
- Between Two Ages : America's Role in the Technetronic Era - 1970
"This regionalization is in keeping with the Tri-Lateral Plan which calls for a gradual convergence of East and West, ultimately leading toward the goal of one world government. National sovereignty is no longer a viable concept." --- Zbignew Brzezinski, National Security Advisor to President Jimmy Carter (It's not that I'm "nationalist". It's that the Bill of Rights will fade away too.)
"What is most important to the history of the world? The Taliban or the collapse of the Soviet empire? Some stirred-up Muslims or the liberation of Central Europe and the end of the cold war?" - 1998 interview
Obama's CHANGE and the Sanctity of the Individual
Why does Obama mock McCain's validation of the Strength of the Fundamentals of the American Economy?
McCAIN BELIEVES THAT EACH INDIVIDUAL (EACH AMERICAN WORKER) IS A FUNDAMENTAL COMPONENT OF THE AMERICAN ECONOMY. MCCAIN IS AN INDIVIDUALIST. HE BELIEVES THAT A SOCIETY IS BEST-SERVED BY RECOGNIZING AND PROTECTING INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS, AS INDIVIDUALS ARE THE FUNDAMENTAL COMPONENTS OF A SOCIETY.
OBAMA IS A COLLECTIVIST. HE BELIEVES THAT STRUCTURES (STATE APPARATUS), NOT INDIVIDUALS, ARE THE DEFINING FUNDAMENTALS OF A SOCIETY. OBAMA DESPISES THE NOTION THAT THE INDIVIDUAL IS FUNDAMENTAL.
OBAMA BELIEVES THAT THE "COMMUNITY" (STATE APPARATUS) HAS A RIGHT, EVEN AN OBLIGATION, TO SACRIFICE INDIVIDUALS IN ORDER TO ACHIEVE ITS GOALS.
During the Vice Presidential debate, Governor Palin clarified Senator McCain’s ideology, which I share, that the Individual is fundamental. McCain’s assertion that the Fundamentals of the American economy are strong validated the significance and potential of each Fundamental, each Individual.
America, in ideal, manifests this recognition and validation of the Individual. Thus, the American economy is, in ideal, an aspect, an integral reflection of this validation.
Validation of any Individual is anathema to the agenda and political strategy presently represented by Senator Obama, who consistently attempts to undermine Individual notions of singularity, of exceptionalism—the Individual must renounce identity as Fundamental, to accept Category: tribute extolled to the Obama Image.
The Obama campaign and its surrogates continue to mock McCain’s statement, a statement resonating deeply with them; they must not only undermine McCain’s affirmation of the strength of the Fundamental, but denigrate any affirmation of the Individual as Fundamental.
Obama’s very public complaint that McCain did not mention the words “middle class” during last week’s debate reveals much about Obama’s own perception of the world. He does not even realize that many people do not interpret the world by default through the paradigms he and his ideological kindred do.
I wonder how many people watching the Vice Presidential debate started in their seats upon hearing the moderator use the indicative phrase “class warfare.” She was unprovoked in this, and we must remember that she wrote the questions herself. Even though she was asking Biden to prove how Obama’s plan was NOT “class warfare,” why would she even be using vocabulary specific to the very ideology that she was hoping that Biden would allay public disquiet about. Ms. Ifill raised a Red Flag here, and did not even know it.
In his closing statement, Senator Biden chose to strongly emphasize that an Obama Presidency would bring sweeping “fundamental” change.
Senator Biden’s emphasis on the word “fundamental” was a public service announcement.
As an individualist and personalist, I appreciate Senator Biden’s focused disclosure, and take it as the valid warning that it is.
 There are many questions which remain unanswered about the mysterious Barack Obama. The mainstream media has vetted Gov. Sarah Palin more in the past week than they’ve bothered to vet Sen. Barack Obama over the past year. When you start digging into Obama’s background, you turn up more questions than answers.
Continue reading "Who Paid For Obama’s Harvard Law Education?" »
|
