Massachusetts For John McCain
This group is for residents of Massachusetts. This group is for discussing how to help Senator McCain in our state.
John McCain needs to run a dynamic campaign. An anemic one will not do. It is yet unclear which sort of campaign his will be.
Now that Barack Obama is to be the Democrat nominee, the November election will be as energized as any Presidential election I've seen since 1988, maybe since 1968. Though BHO is by far the most leftist Democrat nominee since George McGovern, it is exactly his ultra-leftism which gives his campaign its energy (that, and the 9 % of all votes to be cast that his 92 % support among African Americans gives him to begin with). Today in America the ultra-left is well populated with rich, even super-rich liberals who look down upon America, who represent an overseas view of what America should be. This is new. 50 years ago the ultra-left in America was mostly wage-earners. The Viet Nam war began to bring wealthy folks into the ultra-left. Today they dominate this end of the spectrum. They have tons of money to spend and they know supremely well how to network. They also know how to organize. The BHO campaign will be as well-run and as well funded as any ultra-left campaign has ever been, anywhere in the world. read more »
(must be a site member)
- The_Mass_Mouth's blog
- Login or register to post comments
A lot of discussion has arisen about whom John McCain will choose as his Vice President. Though interesting, as it concerns someone being raised into the Presidential Picture, the topic is a distraction. John McCain is not going to be elected President by selecting a good Vice President. A Vice President can maybe bring his or her own state into the President candidate's win column, or he or she can add strength in a policy area, true; but that isn't a major addition to the entire picture. So let's get back to the big picture, OK ?
This election will be won by John McCain, maybe, IF he succeeds in doing the following things:
1.convincing Americans that he is the strongest, most knowledgeable candidate with respct to freign policy issues including (but not limited to) War on Terror matters.
Here I feel very confident. read more »
(must be a site member)
- The_Mass_Mouth's blog
- Login or register to post comments
For those who stand with John McCain -- Republicans especially -- the Democrat campaign becomes curioser & curioser. During the past six weeks or so, as Barack Obama's "politics of hope" has crashed and burned, to be replaced by the politics of doubt, more and more endorsements have come his way. Those who one would think would be saying "I don't THINK so!" to him are saying "yes I can." What exactly is going on here? The more the candidate stumbles, and looks untouchable, the more endorsements he gets. Strange indeed. Very strange.
Of course it might be, as Dan Henninger hints in todays WSJ, that Barack Obama's daily new friends really aren't ftriends at all, that their "endorsement" is nothing more serious than a pat on the back, a kind of political one-night stand rather than a marrage. This might be the case. After all, again as Henninger says, today they are running away from Hillary; tomorrow they might run away from Mr. Obama.
It's an odd way to present a campaign. Do the Democrat politicians really want to tell the American people that their "commitments" are good for one ride only? Are no more permanent than one of Bill Clinton's womanizings? Without trying to relive or re-accuse that cycle, let's remember that in politics the candidate sets the tone. Bill Clinton set an example, in sexual matters, that seems to have carried over into political ones: that a promise of support is good only for the moment. Strange indeed. I doybt that America's voters will choose to vote for such momentary I do's.
Or, it may be that the De,ocrat politicians see Mr. Obama falling like a stone and want to try to prop him up, to give him "moral support," to ease his fall, as if to say "see? it wasn't racism that is sinking you, we support you, you have a future in our party" even as they notice, and do not mind seeing, Hillary Clinton move close to being nominated. That way, they think, they can keep Black voters from staying home -- or voting for John McCain - on election day because Hillary is the Democrat nominee. "See, Black America?" they might be signalling, "when the going got tough for the first serious Black candidate for President, "we stood tall. It is not our fault. We are and always will be the party of Black America!"
It might work. Myself, I find it sad and I think it tremendously devious. We who support John McCain have perhaps the most honorable, un-devious candidate for President in modern times. With John McCain, what you is almost always what you get. He is who he is. You can depend on John McCain. You know John McCain. Politics in a de,ocracy may have attributes in it of contradiction, of shape-shifting, of contingency. But there is no place in a democracy, if it is to work well for people, for infinite deviousnes. For promises good only for an instant. For conning your most loyal supporters. With the De,ocrats, it's always Elmer Gantry time; and Elmer Gantry was a fool.
(must be a site member)
- The_Mass_Mouth's blog
- Login or register to post comments
One of the major issues in this year's election is going to be oil prices and what to do about them. Unfortunately for the Democrats, whose mantra is that George W. Bush has created high oil prices and could lower them again if he wanted to, the economic world actually exists, independently of Democrat rhetoric. In the economic world, then, is where we need to search for analysis of why oil prices are high and might well continue to rise.
In the economic world, oil prices are climbing because demand is growing rapidly at the same time that oil supply is declining. As many publications have reported these past few weeks, oil production from non-OPEC countries is declining at an ever faster rate. Mdexico, Norway, and our own North Slope field will likely run dry within the decade. That would not matter except that new oil production has been slow to develop despite the doubling of oil's barrel price since 2005. Why so? Why aren't thousands of oil exploration companies popping up overnight to go out in search of this liquid license to print money?
Part of the answer is one that George W. Bush stated correctly in yesterday's press conference: Congress is loathe to permit further drilling in North Alaska. The rest of the answer is the same: counties all over the world have been reluctant to approve increased oil exploration and production. Even OPEC, which has agreed to increase its output of crude, has set a production limit, one which significantly falls short of expected demand.
Second, the vast new oil deposits recently found way off-shore under the deep ocean will read more »
(must be a site member)
- The_Mass_Mouth's blog
- Login or register to post comments
Recently I felt the need to re-read "The Conscience of a Conservative." You may suppose that this book was written by Mitt Romney, or Rush Limbaugh, or Marc Sanford or some such. It wasn't. It was written by Barry Goldwater, United States Senator from Arizona, whose seat John McCain now holds.
Barry Goldwater was the Republican candidate for President in 1964, a year in which the John Kennedy Assassination, which had happened less than one year prior, mazde it impossible to mount a Republican campaign. Yet other than that election, Barry Goldwater was a winner. He also created (along with Bill Buckley) the modern "conservative" movement from which Ronald Reagan soon arose -- the rest of the story we all know.
Or do we ? Barry Goldwater was the ultimate "conservative," the man who gave the movement its name, and yet he was
* pro-choice - fiercely so
* pro gay rights -- it was he, a reserve military officer and proud of it, who famously said "I don't care if the soldier is straight as long as he shoots straight!"
* for limited government and no deficit spending
He was these things, indeed he was passionately for liberty of the individual. It was Goldwater who said "Extremism in the cause of liberty is no vice."
So what happened? Why does the word "conservative" today suggest a person who is militantly pro-life, anti gay rights, and in favor of tax cuts for the rich leading to huge deficit spending ?
In a word, religion. That's what happened. During the 1970s and even more so in the 1980s, as a result first of the Supreme Court's ROE v. WADE decision, religious fundamentalists became political activists.
Barry Goldwater hated that. His view was that religion had no business being a subject of political action or of legislation, federally or in the states.
It might also be relevant here to note that Justice Sandra Day O'Connor -- a Ronald Reagan appointment -- was from Arizona. "Conservatives" don't like her much either. Actually, "conservatives" don't much like ANYONE who thinks for him or herself. Their view is that you either obey "conservative principles" or you are anathema.
This penchant for doctrine has infected much more than just the "social" issues. It was rigid doctrine, blind & deaf to common sense & the facts, that caused the Iraq part of our War on Terror to go so grievously wrong. Between Donald Rumsfeld's refusal to listen to our soldiers and Paul Bremer's disastrous de-Baathification, what should have been a strong victory almost became disaster. Only as disaster loomed did John McCain's view -- that we needed to INCREASE our force, not shave it down, and to empower the Sunnis, not make them jobless -- did we turn toward victory.
Fortunately for liberty, Barry Goldwater tradition remains strong in the Western states. Wyoming's Dick Cheney, when pressed by religionists to oppose his lesbian daughter Mary's rights to marry said "freedom means freedom for everyone." Barry Goldwater would have agreed.
So where does John McCain fit in to this discussion ? First, as an Arizonan, he is linked by tradition and comradeship to Sandra Day O'Connor, Barry Goldwater, and that pathway of "conservatism." He thinks for himself, on all issues. Clearly as President he will not be working day and night to impose the religionists' view of things on a Republican party already dangerously off the rails in that direction.
With John McCain, and in the company of his campaign, I feel comfortable, even cherished, as I express my passionate belief in FREEDOM OF THE INDIVIDUAL, no matter what his or her sexual orientation, to make his or her private decisions on private matters without having his face filled with interventionists and their placards. I know that John McCain will not retard medical research -- which saves lives, right? -- because of religionists' objections. I know that though John McCain gives a nod to Samuel Alito, he will almost certainly choose Sandra Day O'Connor -- and her THINK FOR YOURSELF ethic -- as his Supreme Court justice role model.
When reporters say that John McCain is "the real thing," as does today's WALL STREET JOURNAL, this is what they are talking about. John McCain makes up his own mind how to respond to a challenge or a decision. It's his basic policy. In the great American tradition, he lives and will govern AD HOC and not by a BOOK OF IMMUTABLE DOCTRINE.
As for "The Conscience of a Conservative," in it Barry Goldwater spoke passionately about his opposition to Communism in all its aspects, implications, and practices; and he spoke equally combatively about deficit budgets, government regulations, federal micromanagement of everything, the bludgeoning power of federal financial "assistance." You ought to read (or re-read) this book, newly reissued and readily available at big bookstore chains. It might start you re-thinking who is really a conservative and who is just a Busybody with a Busy Book.
(must be a site member)
- The_Mass_Mouth's blog
- Login or register to post comments
Funny that no one's yet commented on the strange inclination of the media to assert that John McCain is at a disadvantage because of all the excitement and interest currently going to the Democrats. Hmmmm...as I see it, during this period of being "at a disadvantage," John McCain keeps on improving in just about every new poll. Both in his favorability ratings and his matchups against Hillary and "Obama" he has increased his standing. The Rasmussen Reports have our guy's favorability rating today at 55 % and his matchups at 50 % to 41 % against "Obama," 49 % to 42 % against Hillary. All three of these numbers have risen continuously since "Super Tuesday." read more »
(must be a site member)
- The_Mass_Mouth's blog
- Login or register to post comments
WHO REALLY WAS THAT MAN ? .....MASS MOUTHING OFF
Michael Freedberg -- The "Mass Mouth"
March 24, 2008 12:30PM EDT
Updated: March 24, 2008 03:41PM EDT
Tags: obama, politics, election_2008.
Here we are at March 24th, 2008, just four months into the Presidential election season, and already the tidal wave that was "Barack Obama" has receded -- with a vengeance. From idol worship to ill skepticism this phenomenon has gone, so over the top that you have to wonder now what it was all about. Who really WAS this man? WAS he a man, or just a craze ? I have seen crazes before in American politics, but usually they arise gradually, painfully. It took John F. Kennedy an entire election - and then some -- to achieve craze status. Ronald Reagan didn't really achieve it until after not two, but three entire national campaigns and one governorship race. Yet here was a craze that grew out of absolutely nowhere to such proportions that it almost swamped the Democrat party's all but designated nominee, a woman with a long and distinguished (if controversial) record. read more »
(must be a site member)
- The_Mass_Mouth's blog
- Login or register to post comments
(must be a site member)




Recent comments
9 hours 30 min ago
12 hours 41 min ago
13 hours 8 min ago
19 hours 58 min ago
22 hours 20 min ago
23 hours 4 min ago
1 day 5 hours ago
1 day 6 hours ago
1 day 12 hours ago
1 day 12 hours ago