Powell endorsement of Obama


Here is video of Sen. John McCain talking with CNN's Wolf Blitzer today, where he said that he "respectfully disagrees" with Gen. Colin Powell regarding Powell's endorsement of Barack Obama for President and Powell's criticism of McCain's Campaign.









Don't get me wrong — I have high respect for Colin Powell. I have much more respect for John McCain, however, and my support for McCain/Palin further solidified with Powell's endorsement of Barack Obama. The fact is, endorsements never change how people vote for the most part. So, it is not the endorsement I write about here, but rather the misinformation and intent presented with the endorsement.

My first point:

The intent of Powell's endorsement is clear to me. Why wait until now to come out with it? Powell may feel that an Obama victory is likely, and he wants to be on the winning side. He may have felt some pressure by the black community to show support. But I believe he wants to try to right his own wrongs in convincing the world that the invasion of Iraq was necessary when addressing the U.N Security Council as Secretary of State. Yes, the man who was key to the war starting, wants to appear partnered with the man who runs on being against the war from day one.

References (in case you forgot this bit of history or were too young to be aware at the time):

White House: February 5, 2003
U.S. Secretary of State Colin Powell Addresses the U.N. Security Council
http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2003/02/20030205-1.html

A passage from Bob Woodward’s most recent book, “The War Within,” that quoted former Secretary of State James A. Baker III, a Republican, as saying that Mr. Powell was “the one guy who could have perhaps prevented” the war from happening.

Even the NYT reported on this background yesterday:
Powell’s Endorsement Puts Spotlight on His Legacy
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/20/us/politics/20powell.html?ref=world

And don't forget, this was based on Powell's belief in the false reports by the CIA on weapons of mass destruction:

CNN Report: Report: Iraq intelligence 'dead wrong'
http://www.cnn.com/2005/POLITICS/03/31/intel.report/index.html

My second point:

Aside from trying to change his own legacy, point 2 relates to the statement that Powell made about Muslims, blaming the GOP and McCain on making Muslims out to be bad people and Islam a bad religion. Quote from Powell on Muslims taken from his endorsement interview:

"I'm also troubled by, not what Senator McCain says, but what members of the party say. And it is permitted to be said such things as, "Well, you know that Mr. Obama is a Muslim." Well, the correct answer is, he is not a Muslim, he's a Christian. He's always been a Christian. But the really right answer is, what if he is? Is there something wrong with being a Muslim in this country? The answer's no, that's not America. Is there something wrong with some seven-year-old Muslim-American kid believing that he or she could be president? Yet, I have heard senior members of my own party drop the suggestion, "He's a Muslim and he might be associated terrorists." This is not the way we should be doing it in America."

Well, folks, the fact is Obama was not always a Christian. His registration documents in Indonesia to attend Catholic school stated he was of the Islam religion:

The registration document was located as an AP photo here:
http://www.daylife.com/photo/01u33pL9Ns06D

"This registration document, made available on Jan. 24, 2007, by the Fransiskus Assisi school in Jakarta, Indonesia, shows the registration of Barack Obama under the name Barry Soetoro into the Catholic school made by his step-father, Lolo Soetoro. The document lists Barry Soetoro as a Indonesian citizen, born on August 4, 1961 in Honolulu, and shows his Muslim step-father listed the boy's religion as Islam.(AP Photo/ Tatan Syuflana)"

What is most wrong with Powell's inaccurate statement is that Barack Obama and his supporters are the ones who have treated Muslims unfavorably in this campaign. Let me just site one instance reported about how Muslims were told not to be in photos that included Barack Obama:

Politico: Muslims barred from picture at Obama event
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0608/11168.html

Colin Powell is simply out of touch politically, and does not have all of the facts about this campaign.

There is nothing wrong with being Muslim. There is everything wrong with being a liar, Barry Soetoro of Indonesia or whoever you are.

My third point:

Colin Powell is not a Republican endorsing Barack Obama; at one point when he was considering running for President against George Bush, his intent was to run as an Independent. For several years now he has dissed the Republican Party.

On to my fourth and most important point:

Colin Powell and John McCain are both American heroes. They both served our country in the military and have both been servants in government positions, McCain far longer than Powell. But which of the two men do you think deserves the most recognition for public service? It is simple: When called upon to serve our country in the capacity of President of the United States, during a time when such a political post is likely to be an enormous challenge resulting in constant threats to one's family and one's life, terrorist attacks, financial woes beyond the imaginable, a savage political arena, biased tabloidal media, and much more — who stood up to the plate? Not Colin Powell. Once again, John McCain put country first.

Although he never served in the military, I give credit to Barack Obama for facing this challenge now of running for President in this undesirable climate. In fact, I make it a point to respect everyone who takes it upon themselves to serve our country in either a military or political position. But it also matters significantly as to whether one delivers positive results while serving, and as Secretary of State, history does not write a story of success for Colin Powell. That day at the United Nations was not his shining hour.

And in my opinion, with all due respect Mr. Powell, your endorsement rhetoric on Meet The Press was another low point, filled with accusations about John McCain that I hope you retract publicly. And you need to do this NOW — before you once again go down in history as the voice who encouraged the citizens of this country to cast a vote they will regret for years to come.









Jonathan Martin reports on an email sent out by Rush Limbaugh today, which questions Colin Powell's claim that his endorsement of Barack Obama has nothing to do with race:

Rush Limbaugh said Colin Powell's decision to get behind Barack Obama appeared to be very much tied to Obama's status as the first African-American with a chance to become president.

"Secretary Powell says his endorsement is not about race," Limbaugh wrote in an e-mail. "OK, fine. I am now researching his past endorsements to see if I can find all the inexperienced, very liberal, white candidates he has endorsed. I'll let you know what I come up with."

As for Powell's statement of concern this morning about the sort of Supreme Court justices a President McCain might appoint, Limbaugh wrote: "I was also unaware of his dislike for John Roberts, Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, Anthony Kennedy and Antonin Scalia. I guess he also regrets Reagan and Bush making him a four-star [general] and secretary of state and appointing his son to head the FCC. Yes, let's hear it for transformational figures."









The Telegraph is reporting today that retired Gen. Colin Powell, on Meet the Press tomorrow, is expected to convey that he is extremely "upset" by the "vitriol, bile and prejudice" he feels has been aimed at Barack Obama on the campaign trail. They also report that some friends and former aides say they would not be surprised to see Powell endorse Obama outright:

News of his appearance on the flagship Meet The Press show this weekend sparked the latest flurry of rumours that the long-time Republican and friend of John McCain is planning to offer his backing to Mr Obama in his campaign to become the first African-America to win the White House.

A friend and ex-aide said that Gen Powell was extremely "upset" by the "vitriol, bile and prejudice" aimed at Mr Obama on the campaign trail.

"We've talked about this and I know it really bothers him and I'd expect him to talk about it," Col Lawrence Wilkerson, his former chief of staff, told The Telegraph.

Col Wilkerson said he did not know whether his old boss was planning to throw his weight behind Mr Obama - a move that could undermine Mr McCain's efforts to regain ground in the battle for the presidency.

But he did offer an insight into Gen Powell's thought process that could make an endorsement more likely just 16 days before the election and with the third and final presidential debate behind the candidates.

"He likes to make his decisions at the 60 per cent point in terms of information and timing. Most people make a decision too quickly or too late, on the basis of too little information or having waited for all the information they are a day late and a dollar short.

He believes the optimum point is 60 per cent for both" It might be argued that with just over two weeks to go before the election and with Mr Obama clearly ahead in the polls but still far from certain to win, the "60 per cent point" has also been reached in this election.

Nonetheless, Col Wilkerson also described Gen Powell as "a loyal soldier who owes a lot to some people in the Republican party" - a factor that could mitigate against an endorsement by a man not prone to gesture politics.

Reports that Gen Powell is on the verge of endorsing Mr Obama have been a regular feature in recent months and influential conservative commentator William Kristol even predicted he was going to be speak at the Democratic convention in August.

In what appeared to be a damage limitation operation, an unnamed McCain campaign source told the politico website that an endorsement would be a damaging blow, thereby attempting to pre-empt any bad headlines on Sunday. The comment could also be part of an effort to portray it as bad news for the Obama camp if it now does not receive Gen Powell's political blessing.

I don't see how Powell can endorse Obama with the positions Obama has taken. If he does, it will certainly be a blow to John McCain. Considering how strong John McCain has stood in behalf of American soldiers in Iraq, it would be an unconscionable act by Powell to endorse Obama just 16 days before the election. If Powell endorses Obama, it may signal he wants a role in Obama's administration, or that Powell is trying to rehabilitate his image with the far-left and in international circles following his support of the Iraq War. At any rate, let's hope it does not happen.






Syndicate content