Media Bias For Obama
Tony Blankley has written an op-ed in The Washington Times that presents the sad truth that the mainstream media in America have become "straight out propagandists" for Barack Obama in this campaign. He compares their actions to the "Goebbel's disciples," a reference to Joseph Goebbels, the propaganda minister for Adolph Hitler. Blankley uses a devastatingly accurate phrase to describe the portrait of Obama the media has painted for the American public -- the "Man who never was."
The mainstream media have gone over the line and are now straight out propagandists for the Obama campaign. While they have been liberal and blinkered in their worldview for decades, in 2007-08 for the first time, the major media are consciously covering for one candidate for president and consciously knifing the other. This is no longer journalism — it is simply propaganda. (The American left-wing version of the Volkischer Beobachter cannot be far behind.) And as a result, we are less than seven weeks away from possibly electing a president who has not been thoroughly and even half way honestly presented to the country by our watchdogs — the press.
The image of Barack Obama that the press has presented is not a fair approximation of the real man. They have consciously ignored whole years in his life, and showed a lack of curiosity about such gaps that bespeaks a lack of journalistic instinct. Thus, the public image of Mr. Obama is of a "Man who never was." I take that phrase from a 1956 movie about a real life WWII British intelligence operation to trick the Germans into thinking the Allies were going to invade Greece, rather than Italy, in 1943. Operation "Mincemeat" involved the acquisition of a human corpse dressed as a Maj. William Martin, R.M. and put into the sea near Spain. Attached to the corpse was a brief-case containing fake letters suggesting that the Allied attack would be against Sardinia and Greece.
To make the operation credible, British intelligence created a fictional life for the corpse — a letter from a lover, tickets to a London theater, all the details of a life — but not the actual life of the dead young man whose corpse was being used. So, too, the man the media has presented to the nation as Mr. Obama is not the real man.
The mainstream media ruthlessly and endlessly repeats any McCain gaffes, while ignoring Obama gaffes. You have to go to weird little Internet sites to see all the stammering and stuttering that Mr. Obama needs before getting out a sentence fragment or two. But all you see on the networks is an eventual one or two clear sentences from Mr. Obama. Nor do you see Mr. Obama's ludicrous gaffe that Iran is a tiny country and no threat to us. Nor his 57 American states gaffe. Nor his forgetting, if he ever knew, that Russia has a veto in the United Nations. Nor his whining and puerile "come on" when he is being challenged. This is the kind of editing one would expect from Goebbels' disciples, not Cronkite's.
More appalling, NBC's "Saturday Night Live" suggested that Gov. Sarah Palin's husband had sex with his own daughters. That scene was written with the assistance of Al Franken, Democratic Party candidate for Senate in Minnesota. Talk about incest.
But worse than all the unfair and distorted reporting and image projecting, is the shocking gaps in Mr. Obama's life that are not reported at all. The major media simply has not reported on Mr. Obama's two years at Columbia University in New York, where, among other things, he lived a mere quarter mile from former terrorist Bill Ayers— after which they both ended up as neighbors and associates in Chicago. Mr. Obama denies more than a passing relationship with Mr. Ayers. Should the media be curious? In only two weeks the media has focused on all the colleges Mrs. Palin has attended, her husband's driving habits 20 years ago and the close criticism of Mrs. Palin's mayoral political opponents. But in two years they haven't bothered to see how close Mr. Obama was with the terrorist Ayers.
Nor have the media paid any serious attention to Mr. Obama's rise in Chicago
politics — how did honest Obama rise in the famously sordid Chicago political machine with the full support of Boss Daley? Despite the great — and unflattering details on Mr. Obama's Chicago years presented in David Freddoso's new book, the mainstream media continues to ignore both the facts and the book. It took a British publication, the Economist, to give Mr. Freddoso's book a review with fair comment.
The public image of Mr. Obama as an idealistic, post-race, post-partisan, well-spoken and honest young man with the wisdom and courage befitting a great national leader is a confection spun by a willing conspiracy of Mr. Obama, his publicist David Axelrod and most of the senior editors, producers and reporters of the national media.
Perhaps that is why the National Journal's respected correspondent Stuart Taylor has written that "the media can no longer be trusted to provide accurate and fair campaign reporting and analysis." That conspiracy has not only photo-shopped out all of Mr. Obama's imperfections (and dirtied up his opponent Mr. McCain's image), but it has put most of his questionable history down the memory hole.
The public will be voting based on the idealized image of the man who never was. If he wins, however, we will be governed by the sunken, cynical man Mr. Obama really is. One can only hope that the senior journalists will be judged as harshly for their professional misconduct as Wall Street's leaders currently are for their failings.
- brianinmo's blog
- Login or register to post comments
September 23, 2008
Press Strangely Non-Whiny about Obama's Private Meetings
From Ace of Spades
http://ace.mu.nu/
When Barack Obama had his magical mystery tour of Europe, he met with foreign leaders. Here's an interesting nugget about those meetings from the NYTimes:
On his second visit to Israel, he sought to reassure voters of his capacity to serve on the international stage. The audience for the trip, despite a private series of dawn-to-dusk meetings, clearly was the American electorate as much as the foreign leaders.
Interesting contrast. They simply reported the meetings were private. No demand for access, no snarky blog posts about how long they were allowed into the meeting. No votes to ban coverage. When Obama met with the Prime Minister of Pakistan, the meeting was private as well. The British press even wrote a story about how the privacy of the meeting with Gordon Brown.
I must have missed the part where the media pouted and stamped their feet about being cut out of that meeting.
And he's the presidential candidate for the Democrats, so his meetings should be considered even more newsworthy to the press, right?
Newsbusters noticed the same trend.
Funny how their outrage seems to be so darned selective, isn't it?
I’ll never forget Dick Armey, the Texas Republican, telling the story of how he first got into politics. He was watching C-SPAN one day and said to himself, “I can do that!”
That’s how I feel watching Campbell Brown. She asks loaded questions and lies in wait with buckshot if she doesn’t like the person she is interviewing—God forbid that it be a McCain supporter.
Brown’s transparent love for Democrats and hatred of all things Republican is so unprofessional – so over the top – it is an outrage that CNN has not fired her.
- McKeinbacher's blog
- Login or register to post comments
Resume Of A Terrorist: Obama's Buddy Ayers
by Jim Kouri
Published: Sep 2, 2008
While the likes of the New York Times, Washington Post, ABC, NBC, CBS, CNN and other news organizations have their reporters digging for dirt on Alaskan Gov. Sarah Palin, John McCain's choice for vice president, their savior-in-waiting Barack Obama is getting a free ride at the expense of truth.
It's no secret that the denizens of America's newsrooms want Obama sitting in the Oval Office, but Americans are being purposely duped by the Democrat National Committee's volunteer publicists, formerly known as the mainstream news media.
If it weren't for talk radio and the blogosphere, even what is known about Obama and his friend, former Weather Underground domestic terrorist and leader William Ayers, would only be a paragraph or two in the backpages of most newspapers, or a sentence or two on most TV and radio news programs.
On Friday night, one of America's top talk show hosts -- who happens to be an attorney and worked in the Reagan Justice Department as chief of staff -- recited a list of terrorist acts that would elicit envy from Osama bin Laden. Mark Levin had his listeners glued to their radios or PCs as he read the resume of a man who should be serving life in prison instead of enjoying a tenured professorship at a major university and entertaining a possible US President in his home.
Because of so-called "prosecutorial misconduct" Ayers escaped what could have been a life-sentence.
As I write this "resume of a terrorist," I find it difficult to understand how a man who is running for president of the United States would even know someone as anti-American and destructive as William Ayers. Plus, Ayers, his wife and their comrades at the Weather Underground are cop-killers. And Obama doesn't just know him personally -- he's a close friend with Ayers.
Here is the "resume" of an American terrorist:
7 October 1969 – Bombing of Haymarket Police Statue in Chicago, apparently as a "kickoff" for the "Days of Rage" riots in the city October 8-11, 1969. The Weathermen later claimed credit for the bombing in their book, "Prairie Fire."
8-11 October 1969 – The "Days of Rage" riots occur in Chicago in which 287 Weatherman members from throughout the country were arrested and a large amount of property damage was done.
6 December 1969 – Bombing of several Chicago Police cars parked in a precinct parking lot at 3600 North Halsted Street, Chicago. The WUO stated in their book "Prairie Fire" that they had did the explosion.
27-31 December 1969 – Weathermen hold a "War Council" meeting in Flint, MI, where they finalize their plans to submerge into an underground status from which they plan to commit strategic acts of sabotage against the government. Thereafter they are called the "Weather Underground Organization" (WUO).
13 February 1970 - Bombing of several police vehicles of the Berkeley, California, Police Department .
16 February 1970 – Bombing of Golden Gate Park branch of the San Francisco Police Department, killing one officer and injuring a number of other policemen.
6 March 1970 – Bombing in the 13th Police District of the Detroit, Michigan. 34 sticks of dynamite are discovered. During February and early March, 1970, members of the WUO, led by Bill Ayers, are reported to be in Detroit, during that period, for the purpose of bombing a police facility.
6 March 1970 – "bomb factory" located in New York's Greenwich Village accidentally explodes. WUO members die . The bomb was intended to be planted at a non-commissioned officer's dance at Fort Dix, New Jersey. The bomb was packed with nails TO INFILICT MAXIMUM CASUALTIES UPON DETONATION.
- Obama the Danger's blog
- Login or register to post comments
The Hill reports that numerous members of the media were seen openly cheering for Barack Obama last night during his acceptance speech in Denver. No surprise - we already knew the vast majority of Mainstream Media were in the tank for him. This just serves as confirmation:
Several members of the media were seen cheering and clapping for Barack Obama as the Illinois senator accepted the Democratic nomination Thursday.
Standing on the periphery of the football field serving as the Democratic convention floor, dozens of men and women wearing green media floor passes chanted along with the crowd.
Two members of the foreign press exchanged opportunities to take each other's pictue while wearing an Obama hat and waving a flag.
Several others nearby screamed "woo" during some of Obama's biggest applause lines.
- brianinmo's blog
- Login or register to post comments
Pennsylvania Gov. Ed Rendell, a Democrat, blasted media elites today at an event in Denver for the "embarrassing" coverage of Barack Obama. Rendell was particularly hard on MSNBC, which he called the "official network of the Obama Camapign:"
Pennsylvania Gov. Ed Rendell was supposed to give “closing remarks” during this afternoon’s Shorenstein Center-sponsored panel discussion with all three Sunday show moderators — NBC’s Tom Brokaw, ABC’s George Stephanopoulous and CBS’s Bob Schieffer — but instead, he opened up a can of worms about bias in 2008 election coverage
"Ladies and gentleman, the coverage of Barack Obama was embarrassing," said Rendell, in the ballroom at Denver's Brown Palace Hotel. "It was embarrassing."
Rendell, an ardent Hillary Rodham Clinton supporter during the primaries, now backs Obama in the general election. Brokaw and Rendell began debating campaign coverage, including the on-air comments by Lee Cowan, and when MSNBC came up, Rendell went after the cable network.
“MSNBC was the official network of the Obama campaign," Rendell said, who called their coverage "absolutely embarrassing."
Chris Matthews, Rendell said, "loses his impartiality when he talks about the Clintons.”
At that point, PBS's Judy Woodruff, who was moderating the moderators event, said: "Why don’t we let Governor Rendell sit down."
That was met with applause from the crowd of big-time media figures, which included Arianna Huffington, Gwen Ifill, Al Hunt, and Chuck Todd.
Woodruff allowed Brokaw to respond, and in defending the network, he said that Matthews and Keith Olbermann are "not the only voices" on MSNBC.
Notice that Chuck Todd - the political guru for NBC News - was up applauding when Rendell was told to sit down. There is not a shred of self-respect or fairness at NBC News any longer. Tom Brokaw knows the truth, even though he tried to defend the pathetic MSNBC network. Ed Rendell told the truth today, and NBC should stop being treated as if they are even remotely even-handed or professional.
- brianinmo's blog
- Login or register to post comments
Where your tax money goes - to Liberal BS PBS
(August, 2008)
Clean up the 20% garbage at the PBS! Do not mix them with the majority of 'good programming', the "news" and current "editorial" parts are totally unprofessional!
The PBS & NPR problem of having one sided biased agenda whenever reporting or editorializing news and current
events.
PBS says it's "independent", Huh?
PBS has a banner about 'Vote 2008' that describes itself as
"independent".
TIMING:
Can anyone come up with an explanation why the next 2 "documentaries" had
to be aired just so close to the elections?
1) Last weekend [beginning of August 2008], liberal Bill Moyers was busy in
his [Frontline] program on Reed's scandalous past (with Abramov), where at the
end of it he makes sure to finish off with a "warning" line that : Jack Reed is
sponsoring a John Mccain weekend, Is that an important of the 'Frontline'
"objective" documentary? or is it blatant anti-Mccain propaganda?
2) After above Bill Moyers 'Frontline' PBS had another anti Republican
bombshell, a film called "Bush's War", I couldn't see all of it but at least two
comments:A: Each time there's a difference of opinion and two sides of the
coins are being brought up, the narrator "picks" the one he chooses to be the
"decisive" line.B: When he comes to the pivotal points in the Iraq violence
he chooses the words: "resistance", never the suitable 'terrorists' (or
other) term of thugs' crimes against humanity, that are targeting unarmed men,
women & children, this attempt to make these low life criminals look like
some "political" movements, is not only dis-reporting but despicable effort of
butchers'-ass-licking, of the lowest of its kind.
Again, you can't help but wonder why these damning films where
aired so soon to the elections if not the obvious to make people nauseous
of the Republican party.
THE SPIN ABOUT OIL
On Sunday [August 10, 2008] the same Bill Moyers on his 'Frontline' he made
the issue brought up by Newsweek about the 'poverty business', the phenomenon
that people find to make money of off poverty and off the poor.A great
matter and case you might say, yes, until he starts to project his left bias, as
he has his guests over that start complaining about [the Democrats and] Obama's
failure in the economy, Bill Moyers tries to shift the atmosphere to bash Mccain
instead, after making sure the guests are brought to the wind of
anti-Republicans he (feels assured enough so) he then shows a clip (by Foxnews)
of Newt Gingrich that he projects that within announcement of drilling (Drill
here, drill now) the gas prices will automatically fall, as speculators of the
oil stocks would be effected by it.
[Immediately, there's a banner on the bottom with the words
"The oil drilling debate", How did the case against making profiting off of
poverty get altered?]
Bill asks the guest Dean Baker (of "CEPR") if
that's true, Mr. Becker answers that the projective oil we will be able to "get"
is small, whether this is accurate or not is not the issue but, still he hasn't
answered the point raised by Mr. Gingrich which is that psychologically, the gas
price will fall down as soon as news of drilling gets the 'go ahead'.
http://www.pbs.org/moyers/journal/08082008/transcript3.html
Of course one sided Bill Moyers didn't repeat and refocused the question,
he doesn't want to hear the true answer, much less, he doesn't want the American
people to hear the truth, that's PBS - BS for you.
Truth is that gas prices already started to go down because of Mccain
pro-drilling and influencing Obama to agree partially to it.
The truth is that the control of our money to PBS by one small group [when
it comes to "news" and "editorials", too bad they mix it in
with good programming, that makes it all even more venomous] of radical
lefty "intellectuals" has been so unfair and so unjust for far too
long.
- Obama the Danger's blog
- Login or register to post comments
* WELCOME TO OBAMA-NATION - A PRIMER *
August, 2008
"Master" in economics and 'in touch' with reality:
He's gonna "fix" the INFLATION by INFLATING your TIRES, increase domestic 'GAS' (all over the 57 ? States...) by pumping more 'AIR'..., will tune down NEW oil prices by an OLD 'tune up', will free us from the grip of Arab oil if we just pay a visit to a mechanic of the 1970's.
"Change":
Obama: Change, change, ??? but (asides from changing my mind a few times about any issue...) I won't tell you what change you are about to "get".
"Sincere Compassion"
If there are no cameras around, he "can't" visit & comfort the wounded... among America's heroes, he'd rather CANCEL the visit and go on a treadmill and to a rock concert in Germany instead.
"Loving" America
According to Michelle she "can" start -- for once -- loving America granted ONLY IF Barack will make it, their "spiritual" leader, guidance for 20 years is an 'anti-white' racist conspiracy theorist.
"Proud":
'Proud African-American':
Not a word against genocide on black brothers in Africa by Arab racism & Islamic apartheid oppression (by radical Al-Bashir & his government, Janjaweed militias, all backed by the international most powerful lobby the Arab league)... or on slavery still 'alive' today in Arabia and Mauritania..., more troublesome is of course the 'Jihad - slavery'.
'Proud American':
Obama the creep (the gist of his attitude): "Hey, Germans, French, we have been so wrong, America has contributed nothing (???) to your current success, my head's under your feet, am I doing OK? Will you please, please say I am OK? Can you guys guide me how to end world wars? We Americans are so stupid... we are such a failure, I am so ashamed to be an American, wanna be European now..., I mean... 'world citizen'...".
Celebrity:
The only difference between Barack Obama Star and Michael Jackson Star is that Michael slept with minors in his bed, Barack slept with the devil (Jeremiah Wright, pro terror fascist) for 20 years!
Unifier:
Be sure to play the 'race card', better let [hint for] your campaign members to do that dirty work FOR you, then play the "innocent and wash your hands clean".
Foreign "policy" (and "knowledge")
AKA BaraCON Barack the con, the master in inner con-fusion & trying to con & confuse:
* We shouldn't have gone into Iraq, after all, asides from Bin Laden "no Jihadi Islamofascist wants to kill us" but we should have increased our troops there... hey! better, we should bomb Nuclear Pakistan instead... and yes [admits] terrorists are 'at war with us' Islamists want to kill us and create a global repressive caliphate totalitarian regime.
* (2007) "we should start pulling from Iraq now, oh, wait, (June, 2008) I never said we should pull out..."
* On our dependency on foreign Arab oil:
Expertise: (June, July 2008) Drilling for oil won't make much of a difference... oops, Well, (Aug. 1, 2008) we should start drilling for oil...
* Iran is a "small" but "big" country not dangerous but very dangerous, yet it's "OK" to meet Iran's-Syria's thugs the: Hezbollah Jihadists = enemies of the 'great Satan - US'.
After all, global dangerous Hezbollah death squads "only" murder infidels or their own people in: Lebanon (Americans & Lebanese officials, ordinary civilians, especially Lebanese kids), Somalia, Afghanistan, (Americans or Sunni 'brothers' in) Iraq, Argentina (AMIA bombing), Israel... or supporting the Al-Bashir's genocide in Darfur, asides of course from it's long criminal dirty arms in Latin America
* Obamapedia: Afghanistan's Afghani speak "Arabic".
* Appeaser: Though he says he'll defend Israel - doesn't clarify the real genocide danger it faces from 'Palestinian', Ahamdinejad, Hezbollah & from other Islamists [because of bigotry even long before it has been re-established], then again 'sucking up' in front of Arab Jordanians mumbles nonsense: "Israel should put terrorism in context" [Hello?],
* Once he says already something positive, he can't even manage to 'hold' it, he retracts it: Jerusalem should be exclusively Israel's Jewish undivided capital but then again, Jews & ["Palestinian" settlers] Muslims should make a "deal" about Jews' historic city.
* We should "talk" to our enemies (Jihad) but the Russians are the real enemies... [Huh?]
An Obama backgrounder:
Not one single truth has he told bout his background:
Flip-flopping / Having it both ways:
In Obama-nation you can say yes today & no by tomorrow, Don't clarify yourself, be "smart", be sure to always leave room for "guessing" where Barack stands on any issue, from reparation to the war on global Islamic terror.
"Openness" & "honesty":
Never answer a question, never be straightforward, honest and open to the American people.
"Humility":
...Finally when pushed to the wall, he - in his devious evasiveness - will choose [how] to . "knows" he is a "Messiah", he doesn't "sweat" before people, he's "above" everybody else. he really thinks he is 'superman'...
- Obama the Danger's blog
- Login or register to post comments
ABC = A BANGING CHEAP PROPAGANDA MACHINE
Another daily example of open and shameless media bias pro-Obama anti-Mccain.
Aug. 5, 2008 [7:AM] , Jake Tapper of ABC's GMA (GoodMorningAmerica) presents what ABC (supposedly) "knows" to be true or false, analyzing Mccain vs Obama on the energy & gas crisis, first he presents McCain with a rage overtone and is very quick to throw the sticker "flipflop" followed by the "false" sticker twice with the loud sound effect of a 'BANG' in a wild speed.
Then as soon as he starts with Obama, all of a sudden the SPEED stops... all the 'BANGS" are gone! the punches sound of a boxing match comes to a holt, as if with a click of a button he slows down with a romantic voice, nothing about "flipflopping" on Obama's CHANGE of mind about oil drilling (this last weekend), heck, even Obama's childish stupidity about "inflating tires" gets not just no belittling but is even being elevated to some level of a cheap propaganda of "respect".
All this is "finalized" by Robin the anchor with a "thank you Jake for checking out the
facts"...
While the only fact is that McCain - American hero is the underdog vs the Obamawood actor.
Because it's never about the issues, nor about facts vs fiction, it's not about the "what" but about the "who".
Hey, Haters at ABC, at least be smart enough to hide your fraudulent "journalism"!
- Obama the Danger's blog
- Login or register to post comments

If there was ever any doubt as to the utter lack of fairness of the News Media in covering this campaign, it is about to be swept away. On Barack Obama's upcoming overseas trip, he will be followed around by all three major news network anchors at some point on the trip! Get ready for wall-to-wall nonstop coverage of Obama's every move and prounouncement, in stark contrast to the media's ho-hum coverage of John McCain's overseas trips.
Senator John McCain's trip to Iraq last spring was a low-key affair: With his ordinary retinue of reporters following him abroad, the NBC News anchor Brian Williams reported on his arrival in Baghdad from New York, with just two sentences tacked onto the "in other political news" portion of his newscast.
But when Obama heads for Iraq and other locations overseas this summer, Williams is planning to catch up with him in person, as are the other two evening news anchors, Charles Gibson of ABC and Katie Couric of CBS, who, like Williams, are far along in discussions to interview Obama on successive nights.
And while the anchors are jockeying for interviews with Obama at stops along his route, the regulars on the Obama campaign plane will have new seat mates: star political reporters from the major newspapers and magazines who are flocking to catch Obama's first overseas trip since becoming the presumptive nominee of his party. read more »
- brianinmo's blog
- Login or register to post comments






