Barack Obama


Rick Santorum wrote a a piece back in April called "The Elephant in the Room: Why conservatives should support McCain"

I read it back in April and remembered it today when I was following the news of John McCain's "Climate Change Plan""

What struck me most of all and reminded me of Santorum's story was his reference to Ronald Reagan's axiom that someone you agree with on 80 percent of the issues is your friend, not your enemy.

I have heard that reference used for a variety of opinions and somehow it seemed to fit them all because it is true.

I do not agree with John McCain on climate change and I do not agree with him on his oposition to drilling in ANWR.

McCain did leave an opening in the debate over how to handle the decision of drilling off the coast of Florida by saying that he was a Federalist and that the decision was something for the States themselves to decide.

Santorum's story is worth a read.

Excerpt:

"I've disagreed with him on immigration, global warming and federal protection of marriage. I've taken strong exception to his view that the federal government should fund embryonic stem-cell research. But disagreement on such issues is one of the reasons we have presidential primaries - so each party's voters can sort out the issues and personalities and choose the candidate who best reflects their collective view. Republicans have done that. Now the question for conservatives is whether McCain fits the Reagan Axiom that someone you agree with on 80 percent of the issues is your friend, not your enemy.

Of all the issues confronting the United States today, none is more important than our nation's security. Although these issues don't dominate our news as they once did, we cannot forget that without a safe and secure country, all other issues don't matter."

-----------------------
For me, I'll continue to support the three legged elephant over the alternative. The "Donkey" just has too many fleas. :)


(must be a site member)







McCain advisor Frank Donatelli appeared on Fox's Neil Cavuto and discussed the campaign with Neil.


(must be a site member)







The National Media is ready to "move on" with Barack Obama as their candidate of choice. Of course, they have been ready to do that for months. They seized on his showing in North Carolina last week as their excuse for doing so (although he still only got 37% of the Democratic White Vote).

But some Hillary Clinton supporters are making it clear they will not "move on" to supporting Barack Obama. In fact, listen to this Clinton supporter. I wonder how many feel this way across the nation?

As a Clinton supporter, the spectacle of having Obamites trying to make nice now that they think he's won is revolting. The Obama cabal has behaved in the most disgusting, depraved, adolescent way since this campaign began. Try writing something in support of Clinton on that electronic snot rag the Huffington Post. Try having a reasoned conversation with an Obama supporter and you will know it is, in fact, a personality cult. These are the people who cheered on the mentally unstable Olbermann when he became unhinged about perfectly true comments Ferraro made - comments that echoed John Kerry. The Obamites later had no issue when namby pamby Obama refused to disown his pastor a week later. These are the people who cheered on Rhandi Rhodes when she called the former First Lady a "f***ing whore". The Obama hordes cheered when he flipped off the Senator from New York. The Obama campaign lied about the Clintons and race in South Carolina - cheered on by the cult. The Obama campaign lies about nearly all his past associations - most recently his connection to Hamas. The noise from the Obama campaign and its cabal on worshipers has been overwhelming at times. With the help of self hating gay men like John Avarosis and star f***ers like Arianna Huffington, the sick, immoral media has refused to do its job and created an Obama myth out of mindlessness, sloth, and hatred of strong women.  read more »


(must be a site member)







Stanley Kurtz is out with a devastating piece in the May 19 issue of The Weekly Standard in which he proves it is impossible that Barack Obama is telling the truth about what he knew of Rev. Jeremiah Wright's radical anti-American philosophy. Obama has acted as if he is shocked by what Jeremiah Wright said about the United States, and how he acted at The National Press Club last month. Yet, Kurtz proves beyond any reasonable doubt that Obama had to know for years and years of Wright's radical views and felt comfortable enough with those views to remain in the church - even to this day. Here is the first part of Kurtz's article:

To the question of the moment--What did Barack Obama know and when did he know it?--I answer, Obama knew everything, and he's known it for ages. Far from succumbing to surprise and shock after Jeremiah Wright's disastrous performance at the National Press Club, Barack Obama must have long been aware of his pastor's political radicalism. A careful reading of nearly a year's worth of Trumpet Newsmagazine, Wright's glossy national "lifestyle magazine for the socially conscious," makes it next to impossible to conclude otherwise.

Wright founded Trumpet Newsmagazine in 1982 as a "church newspaper"--primarily for his own congregation, one gathers--to "preach a message of social justice to those who might not hear it in worship service." So Obama's presence at sermons is not the only measure of his knowledge of Wright's views. Glance through even a single issue of Trumpet, and Wright's radical politics are everywhere--in the pictures, the headlines, the highlighted quotations, and above all in the articles themselves. It seems inconceivable that, in 20 years, Obama would never have picked up a copy of Trumpet. In fact, Obama himself graced the cover at least once (although efforts to obtain that issue from the publisher or Obama's interview with the magazine from his campaign were unsuccessful).  read more »


(must be a site member)








Here is a tremendous new ad put out by the Republican National Committee on Barack Obama. They play on the reality that the Obama campaign try to say virtually everything is off limits in questioning Obama's associations and philosophy. So the ad says, "Can we ask?", and then asks a whole series of questions. It also uses Obama's "Yes We Can" to answer the questions. Great ad!


(must be a site member)








The other day, Barack Obama made fun of John McCain saying he may be "losing his bearings." His smug attempt to cast doubt on McCain because of his age or something else, was played up in the press for two days.

Well, John McCain may be past 70, but I'm quite sure he knows how many states there are in the USA! Watch the video and catch how many states Obama counts. Poor Barry O - he may be "losing his bearings!"


(must be a site member)








Here is video of Sen. John McCain today, May 9, 2008, responding to several questions, including the veiled attack on his age made by Barack Obama, May 8, 2008. McCain took reporters' questions during a campaign stop in New Jersey.


(must be a site member)








Here is video of Sen. John McCain answering questions today, May 9, 2008, in New Jersey, on a range of issues from Hamas' support of Barack Obama to Iran. Joe Lieberman also vouches for McCain saying McCain has "not lost his bearings," as Obama sarcastically accused yesterday.


(must be a site member)







FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE CONTACT: Press Office

May 9, 2008 202-863-8614

RNC LAUNCHES NEW WEB SITE & VIDEO

WASHINGTON – The Republican National Committee (RNC) today launched a new Web site encouraging voters to ask Barack Obama questions about the important issues facing America.

CanWeAsk.com provides Americans with an opportunity to submit text or video questions for Barack Obama regarding the issues he has failed to address or refused to answer, including:

* Why, as an Illinois state Senator, did he vote “present” over 130 times instead of “yes” or “no” on difficult issues like abortion, crime, and guns?
* On fiscal responsibility, how he intends to pay for over $660 billion in his new spending proposals and whether he can do it without raising taxes on families and small businesses?
* Why he voted against funding for our troops after promising not to use them as pawns in a war funding debate?
* Why did he tell donors in San Francisco that the economy has driven small town voters to “cling” to guns and religion?

PLEASE CLICK HERE FOR THE ENTIRE ARTICLE AND MORE INFORMATION


(must be a site member)







Here is the Electoral Vote Projection Map and Poll Average Chart updated today. This map and chart will be updated daily from now to Election Day, November 4. It focuses on the state-by-state matchup between John McCain and Barack Obama. (Click "Read More" to see the Poll Average Chart and to see a larger map).  read more »


(must be a site member)




Syndicate content